To learn more about the types, start with our string trimmer buying guide. CR members can jump right into our string trimmer ratings to compare models. But first you need to settle on which type is right for you. We use each trimmer to tackle typical yard weeds and high grass as well as dense brush, noting and timing how long each model takes to clear a defined path. We also test each model at edging, or its ability to create a neat and straight line along a walkway.
And we look at how easy each model is to hold, maneuver, and operate, noting how difficult it is to start up or feed extra line through the cutting head. We test gas and electric models with curved and straight shafts. In general, tall users may favor straight-shaft models because they have a longer reach. Shorter users may prefer curved-shaft models because they can be a bit easier to control.
CR members can read on for ratings and reviews of six standout models from our tests, the top performer and best value in each configuration. And we should note the Ryobi is louder and heavier than the Egos, plus a little harder to maneuver. And in patches of really thick, tall grass, the Ryobi trimmer head occasionally got wound up in the grass or just pushed it over instead of cutting it. Still, when it came to regular trimming—even in heavier weed areas—this trimmer had little problem on multiple hilly properties in Los Angeles in spring We tested many of these attachments and were impressed with the results.
Using the cultivator with a fully charged battery, we were able to work for an uninterrupted 15 minutes and tilled a 2-byfoot 40 square feet area of the field into a ready-to-go garden bed. For a second test, on softer ground, we tilled up to a byfoot area square feet on a single charge.
In these instances, managing the cultivator is physically demanding, but these tests demonstrate that the Ryobi is capable of cleaning up garden rows or tilling flower beds in the spring. We also liked the pole saw attachment. In , a tree worker borrowed it in a pinch and was impressed with how easy it was to use. The brush cutter worked as advertised too. In general, we were impressed with how all of the attachments performed when attached to the cordless tool.
The Ryobi has a few downsides. On the Ego STT, the motor is located down at the cutting head, in effect counterbalancing the weight of the battery. But on the Ryobi, the motor is up by the handle. With this configuration, the balance felt slightly off, and it took a little more effort to swing the machine around. Compared with the Ego, the Ryobi is loud—a squeal-like, whiny loud. We recommend using ear protection no matter which string trimmer you use. For small lawns with minimal trimming needs, we like the Worx WG We tested it against a number of other light-duty string trimmers, and it was clearly the best.
It impressed us with its fantastic ergonomic adjustments, quick speed, quiet operation, light weight, and the wheeled edging capabilities. The Worx actually has three modes: string trimmer, edger, and mini-mower. This movement shifts the rollers down to the ground this maneuver is easiest for right-handed users. The wheels add control and precision for edging jobs. To convert the trimmer into a mini-mower, you remove the wheels and reinstall them at the back of the debris guard, so they stick down below the plane of the trimmer string.
When we tested the mower function, we found it easy to roll the trimmer back and forth but harder to keep it parallel to the ground for a truly consistent cut. But if you have an area that is difficult for a mower to get to like between two raised beds , these added wheels might help you make a consistent cut versus using the trimmer with no wheels. The height of the cut cannot be changed. The Worx is powered by a volt battery and has no problem with grass, but it struggled with thicker, stalkier weeds.
It comes with a 2. In these cases, we could try to cut the weeds down with a slower approach. What impressed us the most about the Worx: its ergonomics. It was one of the smallest trimmers we tested, but it was the only one with a pivoting trimmer head. Worx touts this as a feature that makes trimming in tight spots—like under a picnic table—easier. But we found that it adds a whole new layer to the ergonomic adjustments and results in a trimmer that is comfortable to use, no matter the height of the person.
With the combination of the adjustable trimmer head and the pivoting handle, a 6-foot 5-inch tester was able to use the Worx while standing perfectly straight. Conversely, someone on the shorter side of the spectrum can do the same. The Worx also has a telescoping shaft, adding a further adjustment to accommodate for height and to assist with storage. On other models, you can modify for user height only by adjusting the secondary handle on the shaft if it has one, which many do not.
These adjustments make it easier to share the trimmer among members of a household. The Worx uses an auto-line feed feature. As the motor starts up, the string is cut to the proper length by a small edge that hangs down from the underside of the debris guard. On the Worx, this process is barely noticeable.
The motor kicks on at such a high speed that the line is trimmed almost instantly. The other trimmers we looked at all had slower motors, which resulted in a loud smacking noise as the string slapped against the cutter, until it reached cutting speed. This really sounds awful, and in one case, we actually thought the trimmer was broken.
Trimming is such a start-stop activity that having to deal with a less-than-perfect auto-feed system got old really quickly. We liked that the Worx maintained its quiet operation through the start-up and into regular use.
The motor just whirls along, sounding like a high-pitched hair dryer. But the other models were all really loud, and their motors had an almost grindy quality to them. A final touch that we appreciated was the little flower guard that sticks out at the front of the trimmer. This guard can be set to indicate the leading edge of the whirling string, so you can trim right up to—but not harm—your prized geraniums.
The Worx does have some downsides that are worth noting. First, it uses proprietary pre-loaded line cartridges. We recommend getting a decent supply of extra spools. Despite all the benefits of a cordless model, in some rare situations a gas model will be the best option—namely for clearing large amounts of grass, either on a steep hillside or on a massive property that lacks a convenient place to recharge.
The premix saves an additional trip to a gas station, and the can is stabilized and able to be stored at home for years. The Echo is available at Home Depot, where it currently carries a 4. Wear eye and ear protection, long pants, and gloves to be safe when using it. This trimmer is usually a little less expensive than the others, but not enough to make it a more appealing option. The Ryobi P Volt String Trimmer and Edger is very small and has none of the ergonomic adjustments that made the Worx so successful.
More than 9, Amazon reviewers have given this Greenworks model a 4. Using a corded model means you can run as long as you're plugged in, and you carry slightly less weight thanks to the lack of fuel tank or battery pack. Just make sure you've got an extension cord long enough to reach the edge of your lawn. By Rena Behar February 25, Each product we feature has been independently selected and reviewed by our editorial team. If you make a purchase using the links included, we may earn commission.
Read on for the best top-rated weed whackers for Credit: Courtesy of Amazon. Best Battery-Powered Weed Whacker. String Trimmer Edger on Amazon. Best-Rated Weed Whacker. Best Cordless with Autofeed Weed Whacker.
Best Commercial Weed Whacker. Best Gas Weed Whacker. Best Quality Weed Whacker. Best Echo Weed Whacker. Best Value Weed Whacker.
0コメント